Most go-to-market teams are still organized for a world where coordination was the bottleneck and execution required layers of handoffs, approvals, and role-based ownership to move work forward.
That world no longer exists.
In GTM 40, I sit down with Annette Sung, CEO and Co-Founder of Amdahl, to unpack why modern GTM is no longer best understood as a set of teams or functions, but as an execution system that either compounds or quietly breaks under scale.
As AI absorbs more execution work across marketing, sales, and product marketing, the constraint shifts from capacity to coherence. What once required coordination between people can now be executed continuously by systems that learn, adapt, and improve in real time. The result is not incremental efficiency, but a structural mismatch between how companies are built and how work actually gets done.
Annette brings a system-level perspective shaped by building GTM infrastructure at Amdahl, where execution is designed for AI-native scale rather than human coordination.
This episode is not about replacing people.
It is about replacing assumptions that no longer hold.
Inside this episode
This episode breaks down why modern GTM execution is moving away from role-based ownership and toward system-based outcomes, and why AI-native companies are quietly outperforming peers by designing execution differently from the start.
We unpack how traditional GTM models were built for coordination scarcity, why those models break under automation, and how handoffs, approvals, and functional silos now actively destroy speed rather than create control.
As AI absorbs more execution work, the constraint shifts from capacity to coherence. Teams no longer fail because they cannot do enough. They fail because too many disconnected parts are doing things that no longer line up.
By the time misalignment shows up in pipeline, churn, or missed targets, the real failure already happened upstream in system design.
This episode is about fixing that layer.
Discussed in this episode
1:24 Why traditional GTM org design breaks under AI scale
3:02 What agentic marketing actually means in practice
5:11 How autonomous systems change speed, cost, and precision
7:18 Where human judgment still matters in AI-native GTM
9:46 The biggest GTM failure mode teams hit with AI
12:03 How PMM, demand, and sales roles are converging
14:27 Why context beats volume in modern GTM systems
17:05 Signals that a GTM motion is ready for agentic execution
20:14 The future GTM operator skillset
23:08 What founders consistently underestimate about AI leverage
26:41 Rebuilding GTM around systems, not headcount
Key takeaways
GTM failure is now a systems problem
Most GTM breakdowns are no longer caused by poor execution at the edge. They are caused by structural friction in the middle. When work flows through too many hands, decisions slow, signals degrade, and accountability blurs. AI exposes this weakness by making execution faster than the organization can absorb.
Coordination is no longer the constraint
Traditional GTM teams were designed to coordinate humans. AI removes much of that need. When coordination costs collapse, structures built to manage them become drag. Speed no longer comes from alignment meetings. It comes from coherent systems.
Roles are being replaced by outcomes
In AI-native GTM, ownership shifts from activities to results. Instead of asking which team owns a task, operators ask which system produces the outcome. This changes how teams are staffed, measured, and led.
Handoffs destroy leverage
Every handoff introduces delay, interpretation loss, and decision risk. AI-native execution favors continuous flows over staged processes. The fewer transitions between intent and action, the higher the leverage.
Hiring is no longer the default solution
Adding people to a broken system amplifies chaos. The strongest GTM organizations now design execution first, then hire only where human judgment compounds system output rather than compensating for structural gaps.
Frameworks from the episode
1. The coherence test
If execution improves when you remove steps rather than add oversight, your system is misdesigned. Coherence beats control.
2. The handoff audit
Map every transition between marketing, sales, and customer success. Each handoff is a potential failure point. Eliminate or automate aggressively.
3. The outcome ownership rule
If no system clearly owns an outcome end to end, you do not have ownership. You have activity.
4. The leverage filter
Ask where human judgment creates asymmetric value. That is where people belong. Everything else should be absorbed by systems.
What to do this week
Audit your GTM execution for unnecessary handoffs
Identify where AI can replace coordination, not just tasks
Reframe ownership around outcomes, not functions
Reduce approval layers that no longer add signal
Delay hiring until execution design is coherent
Why this matters
The next generation of category leaders will not win by running faster versions of old playbooks. They will win by designing GTM systems that reflect how work actually happens in an AI-native world.
Execution is no longer a people problem.
It is an architecture problem.
Companies that treat GTM as a system gain leverage, speed, and clarity. Companies that cling to legacy structures accumulate drag, even as their tools improve.
Design the system first.
Everything else follows.
This is GTM Vault.
If this episode sharpened how you think about execution, org design, or leverage, forward it to one operator who is still trying to solve structural problems with headcount.
Connect
Follow Annette Sung // Amdahl
Follow Rick Koleta
Catch up on all GTM Vault episodes →
